Japan tunnel disaster flashback

Japan tunnel disaster flashback

Dec 4th, 2012

The very recent tragic accident in the Sasago Tunnel in Japan brings memories of our first mission in that country, in the aftermath of the Toyohama Tunnel accident in Furubira Town (Hokkaido, Japan) on February 10, 1996 (Toyohama Tunnel Rockfall).

When there is a probability of having people trapped underground, communication is the start and the end of a Properly done Risk Assessment

When there is a probability of having people trapped underground, like in any other accident, communication is the start and the end of a properly designed crisis plan.

The collapse of Toyohama tunnel crushed cars and a bus, killing 20 people in 1996. The causes of that failure were very different from the present case, but that’s not the point to be discussed here.
At that time, local authorities and emergency crews were heavily criticized by local population, and internationally, for the lack of “people-skills”, public relations, issue management and an apparent lack of empathy. Shortly after, we received an invitation and we were touring Japan lecturing on disaster communication, crisis management, with particular emphasis on the need to communicate with the families of potential victims and the media. That case study constituted the core of a course we gave then, within the frame of continuing education, at UBC, University of British Columbia.

Reportedly the Sasago tunnel is the worst such accident in Japan since 1996 with at least nine victims by the time we publish this post. We are going to follow very closely the development of the Sasago tunnel accident rescues hoping to learn that there are no more victims and the survivors’ families are  treated with compassion, empathy and their needs of information are addressed timely and in respectfully maner.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,

Category: Consequences, Crisis management, Hazard, Risk management

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Riskope Blog latests posts

  • TMW2022 discussion and video presentation
  • 16-11-2022
  • TMW2022 discussion and video presentation covers some important points and coveys our gratitude to the friendly colleagues that helped us…
  • Read More
  • Tailings risk assessment methods comparison
  • 2-11-2022
  • In order to develop a Tailings risk assessment methods comparison we will start by: reviewing a number of existing alternatives…
  • Read More
  • Three cases where quantitative risk assessment was paramount
  • 19-10-2022
  • Oftentimes we hear people objecting to quantitative risk assessments (QRA). Thus today we show three cases where quantitative risk assessment…
  • Read More
  • Get in Touch
  • Learn more about our services by contacting us today
  • t +1 604-341-4485
  • +39 347-700-7420

Hosted and powered by WR London.