- LATEST BLOG POST
- echo $post_date ?>
- In a world that used to be data-starved, is data indigestion a risk? Data starvation It is rare that we…
- Read More
Riskope thanks Federico Sasso for this contribution.
In our days to day practice at Riskope we are regularly confronted with what we call the “specialist syndrome” and have to tackle political resistance which often delays or hinders rational Risk and Crisis Management implementations.
All that seems like a recurring theme which usually foreshadows a disaster. If you think we are being negative, go back to a post Riskope published three years ago. It focused on a rather common fallacious perception of what “high level risks” are. As we mentioned it in the post the anecdote happened with a state owned European Railroad. Top Management ended the seminar with a disdainful judgment toward the “new ways” of ERM. In fact the CEO sent us away claiming that we were too “natural hazards oriented” and not enough “business oriented”.
Why do we recall that right now? Well, the said company was hit in the past few years by a number of severe natural hazards which generated casualties, national media attention, and enhanced scrutiny. Riskope had “written that story for them” before it happened…if only they had been willing to listen….
Corporate prestige, top managers’ initial gut reaction and risk siloing effects are another improper, but sadly common way to define the threats a corporation or entity will face in the “future” without properly evaluating them. Those entities are indeed far away from a correct and rational Risk and Crises Management approach.
Unfortunately, the mudslide which recently hit the railway track caused also the derailment of a passenger train into a ravine. This shows how the political/administrative shortsightedness towards Risk Management can be dangerous especially when magnified by a “Poor Risk-Culture”.
The opportunity to avoid new projects’ opposition, families’ griefs and corporate failure is within reach. By using appropriate methods we would have a robust stance, we would stop the risky behavior by promoting the rational idea of “thinking about the unthinkable” and act in a controlled manner. This would certainly lower the appeal of some alibi buzz-words like “Black Swan” or ineffective tools that abound on the world market.
Although it seems proved that, we, human, have short memories, we cannot ignore what happens everyday, beneath our eyes. It would be fantastic if we start correcting our way of dealing with uncertainties and risks.