Tailings management Geoethics considerations

Tailings management Geoethics considerations

Sep 25th, 2018

Tailings 2.0 include Tailings management Geoethics considerations. Furthermore Tailings 2.0 fosters the link between a new way of tackling quantitative risk assessments and geoethics requirements in modern society.

Tailings management Geoethics considerations

Tailings 2.0, the result of over twenty years of research and development, marries the requirements presented in the UNEP report and offers unparalleled support to independent risk assessors. The UNEP report identifies its requirement in distinct ways. For example by stating: “Establish independent waste review boards to conduct and publish independent technical reviews prior to, during construction or modification, and throughout the lifespan of tailings storage facilities.”

Tailings management Geoethics considerations

The  UNEP-GRID Arendal assessment entitled “Mine Tailings Storage: Safety Is No Accident”  states:

  • “Ensure any project assessment or expansion publishes all externalized costs, with an independent life-of-mine sustainability cost-benefit analysis.” Including, of course the risks.

  • “Require detailed and ongoing evaluations of potential failure modes, residual risks and perpetual management costs of tailings storage facilities.” and

  • “Reduce risk of dam failure by providing independent expert oversight” done by independent risk assessor to maintain good and unbiased oversight. This will “Ensure best practice in tailings management, monitoring and rehabilitation”.

The independent risk assessor will ensure a drastic reduction of conflict of interest. The independent risk assessor will deliver unbiased risk reports. These will be based on facts provided by Space Observation and transparent inclusion of uncertainties in the risk analyses. Tailings 2.0 will deliver unbiased data interpreted using auditable rules, transparent risk registers. All requirements of UNEP will be met.

Following UNEP recommendations, independent risk assessor have to become the new norm. They will base their assessment on auditable, repeatable selections of parameters. These actions foster geoethics, while delivering a more defensible stance and value to the mining industry.

Tailings and Mine Waste TMW2018 Short Course: Tailings 2.0

You are in time to register for the Tailings and Mine Waste TMW2018 Short Course: Tailings 2.0.

We can give corporate courses custom tailored to your needs and covering sectoral (Tailings systems) or corporate spectrum (ERM).

Contact us or visit the conference website (link) to learn more

Tagged with: ,

Category: Consequences, Hazard, Optimum Risk Estimates, Risk analysis, Risk management, Tolerance/Acceptability

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Riskope Blog latests posts

  • Open letter to the organizer of the tailings dam round robin exercise
  • 29-03-2023
  • Dear Ryan, please receive this open letter to the organizer of the tailings dam round robin exercise. It explains our…
  • Read More
  • Landslides risk assessment and monitoring
  • 8-03-2023
  • During the first couple decades of our professional life we worked extensively with Landslides risk assessment and monitoring in the…
  • Read More
  • Societal risk acceptability in the Canadian House of Commons
  • 1-03-2023
  • We are very pleased to see the notion of societal risk acceptability in the Canadian House of Commons, emerge publicly…
  • Read More
  • Get in Touch
  • Learn more about our services by contacting us today
  • t +1 604-341-4485
  • +39 347-700-7420

Hosted and powered by WR London.